Bobby King's eloquent response
in the Guild online newsletter, the Inkling:
Here are excerpts of what the Indy Guild president Bobby King said:
"The Indianapolis Star Tuesday executed one of the most dramatic force reductions in its history, eliminating 81 positions — 62 by layoffs — and dramatically downsizing its news gathering operations.
"The Indianapolis Newspaper Guild lost 26 of its own copy editors, reporters, librarians, photographers and others. It was nearly equal to force reductions conducted two years ago, when 28 people were laid off in multiple reductions in 2008-09 in the darkest depths of the market meltdown.
"Those are the raw numbers — the hard news lead to the story. But the more in-depth analysis shows that Gannett Co. Inc., the Star’s parent company, didn’t like the looks of its bottom line. The Star is still turning a profit. Its editor and publisher have said that repeatedly in recent weeks. But the Star’s revenues have been on the decline. Translation: The Star is making money, just not as much as it once did.
"So, the answer that Star publisher Karen Crotchfelt came up with was to gut suburban coverage, eliminate an entire layer of copy editors (that last line of defense which separates us from the animals in the blogosphere) and make a nip here and a tuck there to reduce expenses. Crotchfelt didn’t sugar coat things. Asked a question about the prudence of such cuts at a time when her corporate bosses are getting six-figure bonuses, she answered straightly: That’s how the corporate world works...
"Star editor Dennis Ryerson, meanwhile, tried to put the happiest face on the reductions at a staff meeting Tuesday afternoon following the carnage. He barely paused to acknowledge the blood-letting, or to show empathy for everyone’s pain. Instead, he charged into a discussion of an exciting new flow chart that will guide the Star into its next chapter. He talked about how the Star would focus less on incremental stories and more on big picture, magazine style packages. He said readers would still find “magic” in their daily paper. And he said the elimination of one complete layer of the copy desk wouldn’t affect the quality of the news product, something that seems truly an incredible statement to this reporter, who’s had his bacon saved more than once by a rim editor who’s caught a misspelled name or an errant fact before it could find the light of print.
"The essential message from Ryerson could be a slogan in Gannett’s next marketing campaign: “Less really is more.”
Comments
User was banned for obnoxious trolling and the comment was removed. --Admin
Comments are closed.
Links
- http://www.indy2012.com/
- http://hoosiergardener.com/
- http://hadenoughindy.blogspot.com/
- http://www.sheilakennedy.net/
- http://bradburyhouse.blogspot.com/
- http://gannettblog.blogspot.com/
- http://www.indianabarrister.com/
- http://sharpwordworks.com/blog/
- http://captaincritic.blogspot.com/
- http://wakeupnaptown.com/
- http://bartonlawllc.com/
- http://indydemocrat.blogspot.com/
- http://www.hoosierpoliticalreport.com/
- http://ipopa.blogspot.com/
- http://www.masson.us/blog/
- http://www.gannettoid.com/
- http://www.howeypolitics.com/
- http://www.indianalawblog.com/
- http://www.poynter.org/
- http://www.editorandpublisher.com/
- http://sadbastards.wordpress.com/
- http://advanceindiana.blogspot.com/
- http://www.munciefreepress.com/
- http://www.bilerico.com/
- http://indytaxdollars.typepad.com/
Archives
- May 2012
- Apr 2012
- Mar 2012
- Feb 2012
- Jan 2012
- Dec 2011
- Nov 2011
- Oct 2011
- Sep 2011
- Aug 2011
- Jul 2011
- Jun 2011
- May 2011
- Apr 2011
- Mar 2011
- Feb 2011
- Jan 2011
- Dec 2010
- Nov 2010
- Oct 2010
- Sep 2010
- Aug 2010
- Jul 2010
- Jun 2010
- May 2010
- Apr 2010
- Mar 2010
- Feb 2010
- Jan 2010
- Dec 2009
- Nov 2009
- Oct 2009
- Sep 2009
- Aug 2009
- Jul 2009
- Jun 2009
- May 2009
- Apr 2009
- Mar 2009
- Feb 2009
- Jan 2009
- Dec 2008
- Nov 2008
- Oct 2008
- Sep 2008
- Aug 2008
- Jul 2008
- Jun 2008
- May 2008
- Apr 2008
- Mar 2008
- Feb 2008
- Jan 2008
- Dec 2007
- Nov 2007
- Oct 2007
- Sep 2007
- Aug 2007
- Jul 2007
- Jun 2007
- May 2007
- Apr 2007
- Mar 2007
- Feb 2007
- Jan 2007
- Dec 2006
- Nov 2006
- Oct 2006
- Sep 2006
- Aug 2006
- Jul 2006

Well said, Mr. King. How can anyone with a straight face (Ryerson) say that less really is better. You can only chop at a tree trunk so long before the whole tree eventually crashes down. How can he truly say that fewer copy editors is better? Will they rely on spell check? I especially enjoyed King's comment, "So, the answer that Star publisher Karen Crotchfelt came up with was to gut suburban coverage, eliminate an entire layer of copy editors (that last line of defense which separates us from the animals in the blogosphere)..." He speaks truth. Best wishes to those axed. It's a mean job market out there. Market your skills and don't be afraid to try something new. Prayers for all!